Site:LRP:Antony C. Sutton D.Sc.
From PESWiki
by Leslie R. Pastor [Antony C. Sutton: The Discovery of the Control Paradigm]
Having a brilliant father (http://worldcat.org/wcpa/oclc/36611149) with a doctoral degree from one of the most prestigious universities in the United States (Columbia University), and who provided me with an excellent education both in Europe and the United States, significantly, structured me with the appropriate ‘milieu’ enabling me to discover America’s Secret Establishment. Without his intervention in my life, I would not have been able to discern the fundamentals necessary to decipher fact from fiction. His circle of friends and associates provided me with a stable influence and an excellent beginning, enabling me to normalize my findings in precise rational references.
My discovery of Antony C. Sutton D. Sc. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_C._Sutton) in the university (library) stacks at Seton Hall University, specifically, Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development 1917-1930 (http://peswiki.com/index.php/Site:LRP:Western_Technology_%26_Soviet_Economic_Development) provided me with an insight rarely understood by the average historian. I recognized immediately fundamental phenomena with respect to ‘revolution’ and ‘technology,’ with the one dealing with cessation and destruction, while the other necessitating intervention and resurrection via technological innovation provided as technological transfers from the United States and Europe.
Antony C. Sutton (http://www.antonysutton.com/sutton-memorial/index.html)
American International Corporation (http://peswiki.com/index.php/Site:LRP:American_International_Corporation), the vehicle used to both fund and engineer the Russian Revolution of 1917, was first established in 1915 with investment capital funding provided by some of the wealthiest families in the United States. It was capitalized at $50 million and was listed on the New York Stock Exchange at $100.00 per share in 1915. [1] (http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/chapter_08.htm#)
Leon Trotsky had been living at 1522 Vyse Avenue in the Bronx in 1916, while working as an editor of Novy Mir. He spoke no English, and yet he survived in NYC, in a luxurious lifestyle. He left for Russia in 1917, with $20 million in gold, with 287 ‘Bolsheviks’ from the lower East Side, followed by Lenin, who traveled in a sealed ‘boxcar’ from Switzerland to Russia. These ‘revolutionaries’ were ‘aided and abetted,’by, American and European Bankers who provided both diplomatic and economic support to solidify their control of the former Czarist Russian Empire. Without such intervention, Russia would never have become a ‘communist’ nation.
Books by Antony C. Sutton [online]
- Wall Street & FDR (http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-fdr.html)
- Wall Street & Rise of Hitler (http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/index.html)
- Wall Street & The Bolshevik Revolution (http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/)
- Wall Street & The Best Enemy Money Can Buy (http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/best_enemy/)
Trilaterals Over America [Adobe Acrobat Reader Required]
America’s Secret Establishment [Adobe Acrobat Reader Required]
An Interview with Antony C. Sutton – Video
- http://video.jeuxvideopc.com/video/iLyROoaft65W.html
- http://stangrof.wideo.fr/?next=6&s=1&sig=iLyROoaft65W
- http://zappingvideo.club-internet.fr/video/iLyROoaft65W.html
- http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6987303668075230852
Interesting Videos of the RTA Inc
A Second Interview with Antony C. Sutton - Antony C. Sutton
(Discusses The Order of Skull & Bones - RTA Inc.)[Video Interview]
- http://stangrof.wideo.fr/?next=4&s=1&sig=iLyROoaftPDO [Part 1]
- http://stangrof.wideo.fr/?next=4&s=1&sig=iLyROoaftPDf [Part 2]
- http://stangrof.wideo.fr/?next=4&s=1&sig=iLyROoaftPDY [Part 3]
- http://stangrof.wideo.fr/?next=4&s=1&sig=iLyROoaftPlI [Part 4]
- http://stangrof.wideo.fr/?next=4&s=1&sig=iLyROoaftPl8 [Part 5]
Dutch Production - Inverview - Antony C. Sutton - Video
The Published Works of Antony C. Sutton D. Sc.
Energy The Created Crisis by Antony C. Sutton (Book)
Alan Stang: A Giant Departs (Eulogy)
My Research Explained
Antony C. Sutton brilliantly details the background of this information in his published works, three (3) of which, he published at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University in California circa 1968-1973.
- Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development.1917-1930 [Publication 76]
- Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development 1930-1945 [Publication 90]
- Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development 1945-1965 [Publication 113]
Alan Belmont, the former Assistant Director For Domestic Intelligence, Federal Bureau of Investigation accepted his research for publication in 1968. His documentation was so remarkable and impeccable, that Belmont notified J. Edgar Hoover, regarding Sutton’s findings. The FBI decided to conduct their own ‘investigation’ by sending their own agents into Russia, to ascertain the veracity of this novel ‘intelligence’ first hand. John Barron, wrote about this in his book, Operation Solo.
Operation Solo by John Barron
- http://www.fye.com/Operation-Solo-Front-Page_stcVVproductId540899VVcatId455366VVviewprod.htm
- http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/experience/spies/spy.files/infiltration/solo.html
John Barron
- http://www.schwarzreport.org/SchwarzReport/2005/june05.html
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Barron_(journalist)
- http://content.cdlib.org/view?docId=tf8h4nb300&doc.view=entire_text&brand=oac
- http://content.cdlib.org/view?docId=tf8h4nb300&chunk.id=dsc-1.7.6&brand=oac
- http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CEFDF1F39F932A15757C0A960958260
Dick Hansen and Operation Solo
Jack & Morris Childs
Dr. Sutton furthered his research, when he realized that significant transfers of technology were ‘military’ in nature and had a direct influence on the outcome of the Viet Nam war. Dr. Sutton’s attempt to notify members of the US Congress about this fact was muted and deflected. The war was not allowed to be managed as a military theater of operation. All of this puzzled the conservative Dr. Sutton, for it made absolutely no sense, until he received a secret package from a member of the Russell Trust, which enabled Dr. Sutton to finally piece together this puzzle. The package was the actual catalogue membership list of the Russell Trust Association, complete with names and references, from the initial inception from its beginnings to the then present timeframe of 1981.
I became aware of Dr. Sutton’s research while attending Seton Hall University in South Orange, New Jersey in 1972, when I became intrigued with ‘revolution and technology transfers,’ especially since this spelt ‘conspiracy’ with a capital “C.” Dr. Sutton’s research crystallized this fact, when I recognized the anomaly. Dr. Sutton explains:
"The way the U.S. perceived the Soviet Union during the Cold War has become known as the “perceptions problem.” The CIA and the State Department were emphatic; the Soviet Union was a real super power with its own self-developed technology and a threat to the Western world. This of course suited the corporate ambitions of the military industrial complex. This was the prevailing viewpoint reflected in all economic development textbooks, in the media, in military planning and the export control laws. It was the prevailing mythology. This mythology generated giant contracts and stupendous profits. Yet it was truly a mythology.
We entered UCLA Graduate School in 1958 after a multi-country, multi-industry experience with industrial technology in Europe, Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Not once in ten years had we encountered any Soviet design technology and we knew that the Soviets were massive importers of the most advanced technology from the West. In our experience the accepted paradigm was absurd....the Soviet Union was actually built by the West and was dependent upon the West for technology. This reality of dependency was concealed by a clever propaganda image that became the dominant reality for the West.
At UCLA this view was dominant, i.e., “everyone knew” that the Soviets were far ahead of the U.S. in technology. No discussion was allowed, as this was verifiable truth, according to UCLA pundits. It was impossible to submit the contrary reality as a doctoral thesis though massive evidence existed and even in the UCLA Main Library!
After three years at UCLA, we were ejected from the doctoral program. A sympathetic member of the Department, Dr. Dudley Pegrum, found a position for this [Antony C. Sutton] author at California State University, Los Angeles, as assistant professor of economics. At Cal State we encountered the same hostility and viewpoint: “Soviets have their own self-developed technology, every knows that….” But we survived five years before denial of tenure.
However, quietly, we began in 1965 a massive self-financed study, a technical analysis of Soviet Industry. For five years we said little and completed the first volume of the three-volume study. The data were not difficult to obtain….the Soviets had convinced THEMSELVES they had a self-generated indigenous technology and the Glavlit censors allowed export of numerous training and equipment manuals and handbooks under the mistaken impression they were needed to maintain Soviet exports of this equipment. These manuals were undeniable evidence of dependence when compared to Western models and designs.
Then came one of those fortuitous events that cannot be explained, but broke the barrier of orthodoxy. We sent the manuscript unsolicited to Henry Regnery Company in Chicago. Two weeks later we had a return letter from Henry Regnery himself to the effect that the work was “very important but not commercial.” Regnery advised we send the manuscript to Hoover Institution at Stanford University.
Again by accident, the manuscript arrived on the desk of Alan Belmont, Assistant Director for Administration at Hoover Institution, and the one man in the entire United States best able to judge its accuracy. Belmont had just retired to Hoover from FBI where he was Assistant Director for Domestic Intelligence….and knew firsthand the efforts by the Soviets to acquire U.S. technology through espionage. Belmont sent the manuscript to émigré Russian engineers, those who had worked in the plants using the technology we describe. This route was probably the only way the manuscript could break through the paradigm barrier.
This was the breakthrough that Bruce De Palma never found. Pons and Fleischmann had to go to France with Japanese financing to work on their ‘novelty of fact,’ as [Thomas S.] Kuhn describes the barrier phenomenon. Yull Brown [Brown’s Gas] discussed below, found acceptance and award in Australia but rejection in the United States.
By 1968 we were at Hoover Institution working on the remaining two volumes. All three were published between 1968-1974 but not without major struggles within Hoover Institution, notably with hostility from former CIA personnel.
By the end of 1974 we had three volumes in print. But the fourth volume (on military aspects) led to expulsion from Hoover Institution in a battle led by CIA personnel trying to cover the tracks of inadequate analysis in official Washington.
The fourth volume surfaced the military assistance provided by the technical transfers and which were not suspected at all in Washington. We did not know at the time that these volumes had also surfaced the so-called “perceptions problem” that U.S. intelligence had been suckered by Soviet propaganda. The CIA wanted the military implications concealed to protect their image.
This author [Antony C. Sutton] was the unfortunate messenger.
The Soviet Union collapsed within 20 years and the world now knows that the system was a technological hoax and an economic disaster. In 1982, CIA Director William Casey admitted that their estimate of dependence was wrong but obliquely suggested that CIA itself had discovered the dependence! In fact, it was our self-financed work going back to the 1950s that surfaced the dependence while CIA reaction to the work was to eliminate the messenger. We have no doubt that history will surface other similar, and maybe some worse, examples of the rigid structure of orthodoxy and its extraordinary cost."
Source:
The View From 4-Space, pp 54-57; Dr. Antony C. Sutton. FTIR Publications. From a hand autographed copy the Author presented to me on June 14, 1999
Shortly after Dr. Sutton's death on June 17, 2002, his books and his name were erased from the Hoover Institution. An indication of how powerful, he was, while he lived, being often persecuted, but never prosecuted for his writings.
Our Education is Not What It is Purported To Be
My Acknowledgement of Antony C. Sutton and his Influence
Testimony of Antony C. Sutton Before The Republican Party August 15, 1972
Dr. Sutton provided significant insight into his operational years at the Hoover Institution, specifically his Memoirs, explaining his significant association with Al Belmont who remained his steadfast support and benefactor, providing an extended contract, when it was recognized by Belmont that, certain factions within the Hoover Institution, wanted Antony C. Sutton to depart. pp. 83-98.
Source: Fleshing Out Skull & Bones: Investigations into America’s Most Powerful Secret Society, by Kris Milligan, (Editor), Copyright 2003, Trineday LLC.
1-800-556-2012
Library of Congress Control Number: 2003095005
ISBN 0-9720207-2-1 (HardCover)
ISBN 0-9752906-0-6 (SoftCover)
Millegan, Robert A. (Kris) – Editor/Author
First Edition: 109876543
http://www.trineday.com
http://www.FleshingOutSkullandBones.com
http://www.boodleboys.com
Distribution to the Trade By:
Independent Publishers Group (IPG)
814 North Franklin Street
Chicago, Illinois 60610
Kris Millegan Interview: Fox News: Transcript:
See also
- Leslie R. Pastor - index of articles
- Directory:Tom Bearden
- PESWiki home page



