From PESWiki

Creating a NOVELTY OF FACT Invention by Leslie R. Pastor

The trouble with creating a ‘novelty of fact’ invention is that you just don’t go down to Radio Shack and buy some parts, and then create a gadget (or paradigm) from scratch, from a knowledgebase formulated by trial and error. Invention doesn’t work like that, because it necessitates discovery, recognition of principle, theory, and the ability to formulate, reformulate and then replicate over and over again, from first principles, establishing first foundations, ultimately, demonstrating the established validity of the ‘novelty of fact’ invention.

Thomas S. Kuhn in his revolutionary book: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, provided the following clarification:

"Normal science does not aim at novelties of fact or theory and, when successful, finds none. Nonetheless, new and unsuspected phenomena are repeatedly uncovered by scientific research, and radical new theories have again and again been invented by scientists . Fundamental novelties of fact and theory bring about paradigm change. So how does paradigm change come about? There are two ways: through discovery - novelty of fact - or by invention – novelty of theory. Discovery begins with the awareness of anomaly - the recognition that nature has violated the paradigm-induced expectations that govern normal science. The area of the anomaly is then explored. The paradigm change is complete when the paradigm has been adjusted so that the anomalous become the expected. The result is that the scientist is able "to see nature in a different way".. How paradigms change as a result of invention is discussed in greater detail in the following chapter."
Source: http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/kuhnsyn.html

In case you are wondering what I just wrote in real-time, let me simplify:

When General Leslie R. Groves (he built the Pentagon in Washington DC) was commissioned to build the first atomic bomb, his job entailed serious technical and logistics problems, not to mention, recognition of the actual 'novelty of fact' principles required to structure its creation. Technical problems derived from first principles necessitated a knowledgebase from academics, theoreticians, not to mention physicists, engineers, and open-minded students who were willing to take risks, in order to achieve the desired results.

All of this transpired and ultimately came together, because of the orchestration, provided by Gen. Leslie R. Groves. It was a massive and expensive undertaking, costing roughly $400 Million back in the 1940s, and required great secrecy, logistics, and the coordination of many highly skilled academics and professionals. All working together, with one objective, one special goal, the creation of a super weapon, so powerful, that it would ultimately END a world war, due to its massive destructiveness.

Ultimately, the creation of the Atomic Bomb, established the Atomic Age, essentially establishing the Atomic Paradigm, from first principles to first foundations. Once success was achieved, weapons deployed, the ‘novelty of fact’ became established fact, and the very same principles used for warfare were then re-engineered (from first principles) for peacetime use.

One must understand that "nothing is simple," only the recognition, after the fact, is simple, once achievement has already been acquired and accepted.

Creating a paradigm from scratch, within the framework that I just mentioned, is essentially identical for all systems that incorporate overunity. Overunity is the acquisition of more energy out than is used to establish the energy formation in the first place. Once the system is established, it will continue to maintain overunity. Overunity is real science, and sustained, academically, theoretically, and physically via serious demonstrable research provided by actual ‘novelty of fact’ inventors, physicists, and academics.

The United States of America in this regard is most fortunate, in that, it has always been blessed with individuals who achieved success in their inventive goals, and their established appropriate paradigms. What is not well known, is that there has always been a backdrop underpinning, preventing those same inventors from freely, incorporating their inventions into an open system, open to the marketplace, without benefaction to first, the ‘money power’ and then to the ‘corporate socialists’ who through their ‘hidden objectives,’ ultimately controlled those inventive individuals and their ‘novelty of fact’ overunity systems.

Fortunately, those inventive individuals are alive today, and are breaking through the existing paradigm, and are willing to reignite the United States of America, into the country it was meant to be, "free and independent."

Thomas Eugene Bearden has already provided the United States with the appropriate physics paradigm, which essentially explains, what these inventors have accomplished. John C. Bedini has already demonstrated the reality of overunity via his significant ‘models’ and his rediscovery of Nikola Tesla’s negative energy. Because of Bearden and Bedini we now know demonstrably that ‘overunity is asymmetric and therefore engineerable. Not to worry, we already have inventors in the wings, who are already providing real products and within real-time markets. Pete Sumaruck, has already provided his 'gen-set'. There is also another inventor Jim Boswell, who also has a working technology. Both Pete Sumaruck and Jim Boswell are brilliant, self-taught inventors who have already established themselves, suffered for it, achieving their success, in spite of their difficulties. Another inventor, by the name of James D. Hardy demonstrated that ‘overunity’ was possible via his N-Machine replication.

What is not well known, however, are the hidden factors, attempting to prevent such ‘novelty of fact’ inventors and their inventions from proliferating into the mainstream. For if they were allowed to do so, would disrupt the existing Energy Paradigm, even supplanting it with overunity systems completely. A subtle warfare thus exists between the ‘control’ paradigm and the ‘novelty of fact’ paradigm, namely those that are already in the ‘catbird’ seat, and those wishing to sit at the table of ‘normal science,’ namely, those ‘novelty of fact’ inventors.

All the Best,
Leslie R. Pastor
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Congress:Member:Leslie_R._Pastor

See also

- Leslie R. Pastor - index of articles
- Directory:Tom Bearden
- PESWiki home page